ext_234665 ([identity profile] firstfrost.livejournal.com) wrote in [personal profile] astra_nomer 2007-07-31 07:10 pm (UTC)

To me, "in the end it comes to the same thing" is false for Guy 1.

Really? Guy 1 is not aggressive, Guy 2 is. Guy 2 is rewarded for his aggression with the higher pay.

Sure, Guy 1 isn't being rewarded, but it was a logical conditional. He didn't X, therefore he doesn't Y.

Post a comment in response:

This account has disabled anonymous posting.
If you don't have an account you can create one now.
HTML doesn't work in the subject.
More info about formatting